BILLBOARD News Now

Trump Should Stop Hosting Summits

Trump Should Stop Hosting Summits

(Editor’s Note:  Tom Nichols writes for The Atlantic, the article below released late this morning is how President Trump has turned summits into a pointless ritual. Nicholas is a professor emeritus of the national-security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College, and an instructor at the Harvard Extension School.) 

State visits are a normal and necessary part of diplomacy. National leaders should, from time to time, sit with one another in person and have candid conversations. Summit meetings between the American president and his counterparts from Moscow and Beijing are particularly tricky because of the innately tense relationship between two adversaries. Food and hospitality are part of the festivities, but in the end, such summits provide important human contact at the highest level, and as a result, crucial business can get done that might not be possible over a telephone or in messages delivered through ambassadors.

At least, that’s how these visits are supposed to work. In the Donald Trump White House, summits are hazardous excursions during which the interests of the United States are shoved aside by a president whose cringe-inducing admiration of dictators makes these meetings into rituals of American humiliation. The country would be better off if Trump just stopped hosting or attending them. 

Read the full article below

Summits are a problem in this administration for two reasons. The most important is that Trump’s unpredictability and obvious lack of preparation make them dangerous. State visits require a lot of political groundwork, and leaders rarely go into top-level meetings without a set of issues they’ve already agreed to discuss. This agenda-setting gets done long before a president actually sits down with another head of state so that stray asides (or rising tempers) do not derail whatever business needs to be discussed.

The grim outcomes of previous summits with Trump, however, suggest that they are seat-of-the-pants affairs, with little preparation, or perhaps with preparation that was ignored by the president. Some of them, such as Trump’s previous meetings with Xi Jinping, have been brief talks alongside overseas events (such as at the G20 summits during his first term) when Trump improvised efforts to mitigate the damage from his needless trade wars. And some of them, such as his meetings with the North Korean strongman Kim Jong Un and the Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, have been fiascoes.

These summits with dictators produced outcomes that were worse than nothing, in part because Trump is so susceptible to pomp and flattery. After seizing the dubious honor of being the first American sitting president to visit North Korea, Trump returned and glowed about how he “fell in love” with the young menace running that prison state. Kim probably thought it had gone well too; he has since been able to build up his nuclear arsenal while watching Trump go to war with Iran over a nuclear program that has not yet produced a single weapon. Trump even admitted last summer that his nuclear-armed friend in Pyongyang will be “fine” as long as America has “a smart president” such as him.

No one, however, has taken Trump to the cleaners more times than Putin. Trump seems to both venerate and fear the Kremlin leader, and when they are left in a room together, things do not go well for the United States. After their 2018 meeting in Helsinki, Trump stood next to Putin and told the world that he accepted the word of a former KGB spy over reports from the U.S. intelligence community. And this was at a time when the president had a Cabinet and staff far more willing to tell him hard truths than his current circle of sycophants.

When Trump met Putin in Alaska in 2025—well, let’s stop right there for a moment. The President went to Alaska to meet a Russian leader, rather than hosting him at the White House or meeting him in a third country. This location allowed Putin to fly in and drag Trump in front of the cameras to force him to listen to Putin reiterate Russia’s brutal stance on Ukraine, and then—adding a true insult—Putin turned down the nice lunch Trump offered so that he could hop back over to Russia. Both men barely had time for a cup of coffee. What Trump said to his Russian counterpart we may never know, but this was worse than not meeting at all: Trump looked weak and hapless, while Putin looked determined and in control.

And that’s another reason to call off these summits while Trump is in office: They are humiliating in almost every respect. They make the United States look like a supplicant instead of a superpower, and they showcase the president’s unstable personality.

Like Putin before him, Xi got the red-carpet treatment on his arrival at Joint Base Andrews yesterday. This is an honor, as my colleague Jonathan Lemire noted this morning, that American presidents usually reserve only for the Pope. But Xi got an honor guard and a military flyover. Trump, who insists on saluting during the national anthem instead of placing his hand over his heart as is traditional, looked up and visibly winced at the sound of the jet overhead, while Xi, who seemed largely bored with the whole business, didn’t flinch. (Trump, for some reason, also wore a long overcoat and gloves on a seasonable day with temperatures in the mid-60s.)

The optics of meeting the leader of the world’s largest autocracy on a red carpet was bad enough, but then Trump did another thing that can be a problem at such moments: He decided to speak off the cuff. The president of the United States reportedly joked to the Chinese autocrat about how the Chinese press corps had the “friendliest” reporters—this, on a day when American reporters were fighting with Trump in court over their right to enter the White House.

Once at the White House, Trump took Xi for a quick tour. Trump had long ago replaced Joe Biden’s portrait in the hall of presidents with a picture of an autopen, a petty jab from a small and petty man, and on their walk, he made sure that Xi saw it. He even gave the Chinese leader a bit of a pat on the arm while yukking it up.

This was too much even for the conservative writer Charles Cooke of National Review, who posted on X about Trump’s “grotesque behavior.” Xi, Cooke said, “is a communist dictator, and the head of a foreign state. Our internal divisions are not fair game in this context.”

But Trump does not think in these terms. His summits are a national hazard precisely because Trump apparently does not understand that he is representing the United States; instead, he seems to think he’s just having a visit with some of the guys in a very cool club of which he’d very much like to be a member. His attempts to ingratiate himself are obvious and pathetic, and they function as a giant tell to America’s opponents: This president likes you, fears you, and wants your approval.

These summits can have serious ramifications. John F. Kennedy and the Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev had a brief, informal meeting in Vienna in 1961. Khrushchev looked at the 44-year-old president, judged him to be weak and inexperienced, and berated him over various issues. (“He just beat the hell out of me,” Kennedy later said.) Kennedy had mostly himself to blame; he ignored the concerns of his advisers, and he was unprepared for the older and more wily Khrushchev. They never met face-to-face again during Kennedy’s two remaining years in office.

The Vienna meeting was a disaster and may have encouraged the Soviets to take more risks, especially in Germany and Cuba. But that meeting was practically a model of presidential statesmanship compared with the incompetence and weakness Trump projects at all of these meetings with foreign dictators. The only time he seems comfortable pushing people around is when he meets with allies, including at a NATO summit in 2017, where he literally pushed the prime minister of Montenegro out of his way during a photo op.

The president has said that he wants to discuss AI with the Chinese leader, but Trump’s recent comments suggest that he has little idea what he’s talking about on that subject. Perhaps others will step in: Tonight, Trump will host a state dinner in Xi’s honor that will include guests from top U.S. technology firms, who actually know something about AI. And then, when the toasts and the meetings are over, the best we can all hope for is that Xi returns to China without incident. Then this White House can return to its normal chaos—but at least out of the sight of visiting adversaries.

Use icons and envelope above to forward this post to your friends.

Follow us on Twitter (X), Bluesky, Instagram, Facebook or Threads.

Trump’s future foretold

Trump’s future foretold

(Editor’s note:  Jim VandeHei & Mike Allen of Axios periodically write a column “Behind the Curtain.  This morning’s foretells Trump’s future.) President Trump feels and acts invincible: He acts on whims, however he pleases, precedent and restraints be damned. But...

read more
“I’ll have no part of it”

“I’ll have no part of it”

“I’ll have no part of it” Karl Rove, one of America’s most respected Republican voices hopefully has lit a fire with current and former members of the Republican Party.  Last week he exploded when Republican BO French, candidate for Texas Railroad Commission posted a...

read more
Our Freedom At Risk

Our Freedom At Risk

Today American democracy is more at risk than at any point since the 1960’s.  Nothing makes that point stronger than the President of the United States abruptly ordering the removal of major traditional news media from covering the White House.  Telling CNN, MS Now...

read more
Pause AI for Humanity’s Sake

Pause AI for Humanity’s Sake

(Editor’s Note: Peggy Noonan wrote the piece below which has resulted in AI becoming the scariest political issue & talked about in the country today.  Ms. Noonan is a Pulitzer Prize winning author and Wall Street Journal opinion columnist.) There is no subject...

read more
Let’s Pretend

Let’s Pretend

President Trump gathered what few supporters he has last night to play “Let’s Pretend”.  They all charged to Dallas to pay their final respects to a dying presidency.  Before the final rites were pronounced on election day November 3rd, he asks the adoring friends to...

read more
Not So Supreme, Mr. Roberts

Not So Supreme, Mr. Roberts

(Editor's note:  This morning Maureen Dowd, opinion columnist for The New York Times, wrote the piece below.  Ms. Dowd is an American Journalist, best-selling author, and Pulitzer Prize-winning writers.) It’s crazy to think about Donald Trump outrunning anything. But...

read more
Publishers Message

Publishers Message

We heard from our readers after recently publishing articles and opinion pieces from respected authors, journals & newspapers.  They suggested we do more.  We plan to do so but will continue to offer our own commentary and ideas.  Suggestions are always welcome at...

read more
Not Time for Silence

Not Time for Silence

President Trump has us in a fix.  All the while he sits at the resolute desk coloring maps, renaming Lake Ontario and contemplating a new name for an ocean.  He has us in a trade war, a real war, an affordability crisis, deportation of our neighbors, fighting with a...

read more
4 Political Junkies

4 Political Junkies

(Editor’s note: Moments ago, The Atlantic published a politics piece by Yvonne Wingett Sanchez, Michael Scherer and Ashley Parker.) Trump Plans to Buy Midterm Ads About His Own Record.   President Trump gathered his top political advisers in the Oval Office early this...

read more
Art of the Self-Deal

Art of the Self-Deal

(Editor’s note:  Peggy Noonan is one of America’s most respected writers & columnist at the Wall Street Journal.  Today her column “Declarations” provides thoughts on how Trump-era corruption is affecting Americans as a people.) I’m thinking about the deeper...

read more
Broken

Broken

Is the Republican Party deeply divided, in transition or simply “broken”?  Is the Democratic Party badly troubled or broken to the point where it cannot recover? No doubt the old Republican Party is clearly busted.  For decades the GOP was built around limited...

read more
Trump Is Driving Socialism

Trump Is Driving Socialism

Is the Republican Party deeply divided, in transition or simply “broken”?  Is the Democratic Party badly troubled or broken to the point where it cannot recover? No doubt the old Republican Party is clearly busted.  For decades the GOP was built around limited...

read more

BILLBOARD Archives

Trump Is Driving Socialism

Trump Is Driving Socialism

What caused this move toward socialism?  This wasn’t a topic during Obama’s tenure.  Why now?  Trump & his band of billionaires want only more money…while the rest of us want opportunity.  So now suddenly “socialism” has become a political issue. Is it because...

read more
Trump’s Niece Talks

Trump’s Niece Talks

(Editor's note:  MS NOW interviewed Mary Trump the niece of President Trump.  She provides a look into his "Erratic" Behavior.) https://youtu.be/Tkad2nGz0So?si=ZURQ3FuK1V42pvfa          

read more
Can You Believe?

Can You Believe?

(Editor’s note:  Axios AM by Mike Allen published “Trump’s presidential paywall”.  Coupled with the Wall Street Journal Exclusive we shared yesterday readers can learn what Trump’s focus is money.) For years, Truth Social was President Trump's money-losing megaphone....

read more
Trump’s Operation

Trump’s Operation

(Editor’s note: An Exclusive article ran in The Wall Street Journal recently.  It provides an inside look at Trump’s unprecedented fundraising operation.  The piece is quite long.  After the opening paragraph a link is provided to click to read the entire piece.  It...

read more
Socialism Communism Trumpism

Socialism Communism Trumpism

There is a current conversation in the political world about socialism, after the success democratic socialists had in New York.  And they have gone on to win other important primaries across the country.  So much so that establishment Democrats are in a stew.  If...

read more
Unending War Costs

Unending War Costs

Since President Trump entered the war in the Middle East without a clear strategy…it’s maybe time for Americans to focus on future costs.  The news media has well covered the impact Trump’s war is having on Americans households…gasoline to food cost. When Americans...

read more
Save America Act Backfire

Save America Act Backfire

(Editor’s note: The Wall Street Journal Review & Outlook today expressed an opinion about the Save America Act.  It is being shared so you can form an opinion.) President Trump broke into prime-time TV on Thursday night to talk to the nation about election...

read more
Trump’s Real Source of Power

Trump’s Real Source of Power

(Editor’s note: Robert Reich, a former US secretary of labor, a professor of public policy emeritus at the University of California, Berkeley.  And a Guardian US Columnist.  Today his opinion piece “The Nato summit exposed the real source of Trump’s power”.  Whether...

read more
Winning Is Work

Winning Is Work

A three-alarm fire was set off when a small number of Democratic Socialists of America experienced electoral success in New York & elsewhere.  Various levels of the Democratic party have reacted with concern.  Is not the Democratic party big enough to encompass...

read more
On This Day

On This Day

On this day 250 years ago, John Adams while in Philadelphia to sign the Declaration of Independence wrote to his wife Abigail saying  “I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated, by succeeding Generations, as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be...

read more
Red Scare

Red Scare

President Trump put America on alert that communists were overtaking the Democratic Party.  He told a convention of the Faith & Freedom Coalition “We have to stop this, this horrible thread of cancer that’s permeating our country called communism.”  This sounded a...

read more
Big Tent

Big Tent

(Editor’s note:  Robert Harris, a lifelong Democrat offers his view of the Democratic party following this week’s primary elections in New York.  Harris through retired actively follows the political world.) The best I can tell there are two Democratic Socialists...

read more
Skip to content